Skip to main content

Where the organisation makes solely automated decisions about the person, the response states the significance of those decisions and their likely consequences.

Intent

Knowing how a decision was reached is of little use without knowing what it did to the person - what they were refused, charged or ranked for.

How to test it

An assessor scores the criterion against a single response:

Score 2
The response states what the decisions mean for the person and what follows from them.
Score 1
The response describes the consequences in general terms that are not about this person.
Score 0
The response says nothing about the significance or consequences of the decisions.
Not applicable
The organisation makes no solely automated decisions about the person.

The law it reflects

This criterion reflects Article 15(1)(h) of the UK GDPR. That mapping is a guide, not a legal test: conformance is judged against the criterion, not the article.

See E10 in context in the full standard.

Back to reference material

Report a problem with this page